Moderator: Integra Moderator
"Dr. Bantham";p="16335" wrote:I agree that a name change is in order, but KisMod?
Seriously, the last thing I want to do is offend those that work so hard on this project for the benefit of the community, but this new name does not work for me at all. From a marketability perspective, it seems to fall far short of the mark. It sounds cute and fails to instill confidence.
Besides, the past strength of IntegraMOD was the vast amount of modifications which were integrated. The "Keep It Simple" concept is to strip down things to the essentials as a sacrifice for maintaining ease of use and reliability. Though maintaining the latter two concepts is a great idea, it is still important to note that the pre-mod concept is to build upon the phpBB core with collection of feature-laden mods, not strip things down. It is a total contradiction, in my mind.
There is also the fact that it will no doubt lead to confusion with the Kiss Portal project, which was clearly defined as a separate development. Sure, turning mods on and off from the ACP would certainly make the process simple, but it still does not quite fit. Besides, even if the two projects merge it will still be waaay down the line.
Again, I am grateful for all of the hard work, but I can not help but voice my opinion on what I believe to be a poor name choice.
What is in name?
"Fubie";p="16432" wrote:Just so eveyone is aware. A name change at this point will set the release back considerably as many changes will need to be made as well as domain considerations.
"Fubie";p="16432" wrote:Just so eveyone is aware. A name change at this point will set the release back considerably as many changes will need to be made as well as domain considerations.
A name change at this point will set the release back considerably as many changes will need to be made as well as domain considerations.
"HelterSkelter";p="16461" wrote:if you clicked on Mambo, you would have clicked on Kis
"Solomon";p="16473" wrote:Why not just start a simple feedback poll <img>
"The American Heritage Dictionary" wrote:irregardless
SYLLABICATION: irÂÂÂ ·reÂÂÂ ·gardÂÂÂ ·less
PRONUNCIATION: r-gÃÂÂ ¤rdls
ADVERB: Nonstandard Regardless.
ETYMOLOGY: Probably blend of irrespective and regardless.
USAGE NOTE: Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative irà¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“ prefix and à¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.
Alright, this is one bandwagon I will have to jump on!"evolver";p="16455" wrote:Your are talking about popularity, but who doesn't remember KISS being a popular rockband?
"Fubie";p="16432" wrote:
I actually like KisMod myself. Perhaps because I've allowed it to grow on me.
"Frost";p="16441" wrote:
It appears I'm about 50/50 on this discussion and I'll leave it that way.
"Dioncecht";p="16734" wrote:By the way, someone closed a <table> tag somewhere on the Post page so if you hit Post A Reply, it's all jacked up...
"Dioncecht";p="16734" wrote:Would there be a possibility of a 'pre-release' for those of us like myself who are not upgrading but starting all over again from scratch? Just the install without the upgrade script?
"Dioncecht";p="16734" wrote:By the way, someone closed a <table> tag somewhere on the Post page so if you hit Post A Reply, it's all jacked up...
##-----[ OPEN ]------------------------------------------# includes/topic_review.php ##-----[ FIND ]------------------------------------------# $bbcode_uid = $row['bbcode_uid']; ##-----[ AFTER, ADD ]------------------------------------------# $message = preg_replace("#[web]#si", '[align=center:'.$bbcode_uid.'][size=99px]( ', $message); $message = preg_replace("#[/web:$bbcode_uid]#si", ' )[/size][/align:'.$bbcode_uid.']', $message); ##-----[ SAVE/CLOSE/UPLOAD ALL FILES ]------------------------------------------## EoM
"Solomon";p="16752" wrote:Simple? Can someone give me an example of some CMS software that is considered not-so simple?
"thatjoeguy";p="16747" wrote:"Dioncecht";p="16734" wrote:By the way, someone closed a <table> tag somewhere on the Post page so if you hit Post A Reply, it's all jacked up...
Doing that when you hit QUOTE, too."Dioncecht";p="16734" wrote:Would there be a possibility of a 'pre-release' for those of us like myself who are not upgrading but starting all over again from scratch? Just the install without the upgrade script?
I'd really like this as well, as I'm converting over from Nuke...
"Solomon";p="16756" wrote:Simple until the next hacking spree.
Simple until you want to install custom mods.
Simple until the next phpBB update and you cant use the pre-modded files because you have custom mods installed.
Keep it Stock Modified or its not going to be Keep it Simply Modified anymore.
I dunno, maybe I am just a noob <img> but I dont find all this stuff that simple all the time.
à¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¦ if ( mod_installed(mod_name) ){ this section will contain the original code with mod edits}else{ à¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¦ this section will contain the original code no edits à¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¦}à¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¦
<IF> code plus your mod edits<ELSE> code without your mod edits i.e. original code untouched <ENDIF>
define ('KISS_INSTALLED', true);define('IN_PHPBB', true);$phpbb_root_path = './';$phpEx = substr(strrchr(__FILE__, '.'), 1);include($phpbb_root_path . 'common.' . $phpEx);include($phpbb_root_path . 'includes/functions_display.' . $phpEx); if(KISS_INSTALLED) include_once($phpbb_root_path . 'includes/blocks_main.' . $phpEx);
"Fubie";p="16759" wrote:"Solomon";p="16756" wrote:Simple until the next hacking spree.
Simple until you want to install custom mods.
Simple until the next phpBB update and you cant use the pre-modded files because you have custom mods installed.
Keep it Stock Modified or its not going to be Keep it Simply Modified anymore.
I dunno, maybe I am just a noob
"Michaelo";p="16760" wrote:What I mean by simple, this should provide some clarification... [url=http]It can be simple[/url]
AND
The 'Keep It Simple' MOD method which allows for editing of the core files (php or theme htm) while allowing updates to go smoothly (fairly smoothly) is... (taken from another post)
Ideas for the future... phpBB3 and New Portal
How can I add code to the core without affecting the core?
Simpleà¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¦ examine the following php codeà¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¦
- Code: Select all
à¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¦ if ( mod_installed(mod_name) ){ this section will contain the original code with mod edits}else{ à¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¦ this section will contain the original code no edits à¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¦}à¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¦
No need for the usual line of explanation hereà¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¦ its really simpleà¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¦
Ah! But I have edited the core here! Not reallyà¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¦ you have added to it without affecting it. If you run an update script on this file such as SVN update your code will remain and only the original code will be updatedà¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¦ If you need to update the file itself use something like winmerge to do the edits...
In a html file
Simpleà¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¦ examine the following html codeà¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¦
- Code: Select all
<!-- IF module_name --> code plus your mod edits<!-- ELSE --> code without your mod edits i.e. original code untouched <!-- ENDIF -->
No need for the usual line of explanation hereà¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¦ its really simpleà¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ¦
This is only for mods that must edit the core... The majority of well written mods will not require core editing... (I hope)
A real example... Actual edit to the index.php using kiss portal (kismod). Note this is the only edit to the file...
- Code: Select all
define ('KISS_INSTALLED', true);define('IN_PHPBB', true);$phpbb_root_path = './';$phpEx = substr(strrchr(__FILE__, '.'), 1);include($phpbb_root_path . 'common.' . $phpEx);include($phpbb_root_path . 'includes/functions_display.' . $phpEx); if(KISS_INSTALLED) include_once($phpbb_root_path . 'includes/blocks_main.' . $phpEx);
Mike
"found it";p="16772" wrote:enough said....
"Michaelo";p="16786" wrote:Some confusion re KisMod must be cleared up at this point... KisMod is the code name for the next release of IntegraMod powered by phpBB3 and the Kiss Portal...
"Drop-Forged";p="16801" wrote:1. The update we are waiting for is going to be called Integramod version 141 even though this site is KisMod and Wekke has nothing to do with the upgrade.
...Ok if Im correct, I think I got that, but what is E-tegra then???
"Drop-Forged";p="16801" wrote:2. Version 141 is going to be the last version of this really great portal system, because you guys going to start KisMod that will be phpBB3 based and Wekke, well I havent figured out where his new portal system is going yet.
"HelterSkelter";p="16807" wrote:and yes I did grab integrmod.com and .net ....just in case
I am in total agreement here."cleo";p="16813" wrote:i think when IM 141 is released, it should go by the name of integrmod, and all the support for IM, all versions should be moved to that domain.
integrmod.com should be kept for Michaelo development of the kissportal with phpbb3.
just seems the simplest to me,
when you want support for IM, you go to integrmod.com
when you want to see how the kisportal and phpbb3 is coming along, go to integrmod.com (or Michaelo's site if he does not move his stuff to integrmod.com)
"Unregistered";p="17064" wrote:I seriously dont care abt the name change . And how soon is very soon? Days, Weeks, MOnths or Years?
what matters is the system remain the same and the admin/mods crew are same.. even though its renamed.. it wil take least 6 month or less to spread the words regarding the name change.. also my site wont effect from the name change. so basically the name change doesnt matter as long as the system is good and relaible.
we (users) are wasting time debating abt the name change here..
Registered users: App360MonitorBot, Bing [Bot], Google [Bot]